Author: Louisa May Alcott
Year of Publication: 1868 (Part One) and 1869 (Part Two)
Age First Read: 31 (Surprise!)
Memory
“Little Women” was one of the first ‘for sure’ titles when originally putting together the lists for this project. Or so I thought. In February, I posted a sad photo on Instagram of my books in storage and how they’re waiting for me. I got some comments that definitely missed the tone, but I also found engagement, asking if anyone had read any of the books you could see in the picture. As I zoomed in myself, I realized that right on top was the book I had been remembering and planning for. It was in fact, by Louisa May Alcott, but it was not “Little Women.” The book I’d been thinking of the entire time, another book inherited from mom, was actually “The Quiet Little Woman: A Christmas Story.”
I have decided to still read “Little Women” now because I grew up with the movie. I’ve seen it at least a handful of times and loved it with every rewatch. I haven’t seen but plan to watch the PBS miniseries and the Greta Gerwig remake. I know I had to read the book at some point, and I very well could have read it at this age. I just don’t remember.
I look forward to getting more details than the movie gives, and as with every other RoaAB book, seeing how it affects me now.
Review/ Experience
The copy of “Little Women” that I ended up with, after an hour spent on the library website deciding what version I needed, provided both education and inspiration. I painted my nails in red, yellow, white, and greens referencing the beautiful floral cover. From the back blurb I learned that aside from the first run selling out in 2 weeks, “Little Women” has never been out of print all these years.
I enjoyed the entire book, early on knowing this is the stuff I live for, and the stuff I want to read. I’m loving these classics written by women because of history and discrimination and all of the limitations they faced. So many of the first books I reread were written by men, which I have no problem with, but I’m glad things are evening out.
Reading “Little Women” during such a huge resurgence of girlhood, a revolution, was unplanned perfect timing. Not only does this book dive into the feminine, but all things human about girls and women. Our interests and ideas, hopes and dreams, which can be vastly different in the same family, but also very much the same. How our lives can simultaneously be pretty and devastating. It’s in fashion, hobbies, and especially pop culture. There’s something about reading this ‘girl’s story’ as a 31-year-old woman, in this age where we are reclaiming our youth and removing the boundaries of enjoying things that are often deemed lesser than just because little girls appreciate them. “Little Women” connects so deeply to me not only in this time in the world but in my life- of reconnecting with myself, remembering who I was, making peace with my past, and rediscovering what I love. It is magical how Louisa May Alcott beautifully illustrated and dissected being a woman in a way that is so timeless it hits me in my soul in 2024. It is layered, conflicting, and comprehensive. It is the most honest picture of girlhood I have ever read.
Though over 100 years old, I don’t want to give away everything as I think everyone should read “Little Women” at least once. Plus, I’ve always intended to write about these experiences without spoilers, even though I haven’t been successful yet. So, here are a handful of opinions, that you’ll get if you know:
- I fully believe Jo had every right to still be devastated over her manuscript.
- I can’t get over the canary. I am glad I continued forward and finished the book, but this was unnecessary and cruel.
- I live for the moments of Meg finding her power in herself when falling in love.
- I understand Jo’s arc of writing “sensational stories,” but a girl’s got to eat.
At some point I realized that I have actually not read “Little Women” before now. Unlike the dismay of reading “A Little Prince” and not much being familiar, this was a wonderful time. I had enough background from the movie to hunger for anything extra I was offered. I spent much more than a few hours with the characters, and when I wasn’t reading, I was often thinking about what I read.
This read almost acts as one of the Bookmarks of this project, as well as an early “wanted to read,” and a “should have, would have read.” I love the 90’s movie, but that has been my only reference until now. In the book, Jo’s wants and dreams are clear from the beginning, and sadly never included Laurie in the way he wanted. I ship them so hard in the movie but the events to come make so much more sense now. Reading the book offers more satisfaction and peace, though it still includes its fair share of devastation.
Overall, the language isn’t stuffy despite the time period it was written in, and almost feels like slang sometimes. Or at least when Jo speaks, which reminds me of Shakespeare. I really enjoyed all the extras- the play, newsletter, storytelling, letters, and journals. These characters are not only talked about, but the author allows them to tell us about themselves in their own voices. I still connect to Jo most, but with over 500 pages I’ve found myself in all of the March sisters. I love this family and this story and will read the other books in the series someday too.
“But, you see, Jo wasn’t a heroine, she was only a struggling human girl like hundreds of others, and she just acted out her nature, being sad, cross, listless, or energetic, as the mood suggested. It’s highly virtuous to say we’ll be good, but we can’t do it all at once, and it takes a long pull, a strong pull, and a pull all together before some of us even get our feet set in the right way.”